Van Compare is a UK van insurance price comparison website. We share general information, not personal recommendations.
Published: 26 Jun 2014 | Last reviewed: 26 Jun 2014 | Reviewed by: VanCompare Editorial Team
This article was originally written around a set of ABI figures that were widely quoted at the time. Those numbers were real — but they were for 2013, not “recent”.
In 2013, the ABI said insurers detected £1.3 billion of fraudulent insurance claims in total, and its motor fraud figures included 59,900 dishonest motor claims worth £811 million.
What the latest ABI fraud data shows
Fast forward to the newest ABI annual detected fraud release (published 17 November 2025, covering calendar year 2024):
- Insurers Detected £1.16 billion of fraudulent general insurance claims in 2024.
- ABI-Reported motor insurance fraud accounted for 51,700 motor scams worth £576 million in 2024 (over half of detected bogus claims by volume).
So, while the “£811m motor fraud” figure belongs to 2013, fraud remains a major operational cost today — and motor is still a prime target.
What “fraud” looks like for van drivers and fleets in 2026
Fleet operators tend to get hit in a few predictable ways:
- Induced/staged collisions (“crash for cash”) and exaggerated injury/repair claims. The Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) flags warning signs and encourages reporting.
- Identity/document harvesting after minor impacts (for example, criminals pushing to photograph documents) that can lead to policies and claims being taken out in someone else’s name. Recent IFB-linked warnings highlight this pattern.
- Digitally Manipulated evidence (edited photos/“shallowfakes”) used to support claims that don’t match reality.
How in-vehicle tech helps (and what it won’t do)
In-vehicle tech doesn’t “stop fraud”, but it can reduce how often fleets get stuck with blame — and can make it easier for insurers to challenge questionable claims.
1) Cameras (dashcams / multi-camera systems)
-
Useful for:
- Showing who moved first at junctions/roundabouts
- Documenting lane position and braking
- Rebutting “your driver reversed into me” style disputes
- Cameras Don’t always capture side impacts or what happened off-frame
- Footage Needs reliable retention, time/date accuracy, and secure handling
2) Telematics and driver data
-
Useful for:
- Speed/Braking/location verification
- Identifying patterns and coaching drivers (lower collision exposure overall)
- Doesn’t prove what another road user did, only what your van did
3) Fleet processes still matter most
- Clear “after an incident” steps (photos, witness details, immediate reporting)
- Driver Coaching on common scam patterns and safe information sharing
- Consistent defect reporting and maintenance (to avoid mixed-fault claims)
A quick “after an incident” checklist for drivers
If there’s a bump or suspicious behaviour:
- Move to a safe location if possible and call police if anyone is injured or threatened.
- Exchange only the essentials (name, address, vehicle registration) and avoid sharing extra ID unless required by police.
- Take Photos of positions, damage, road layout, and any witnesses.
- Report to your insurer/fleet manager quickly and preserve any camera footage.
Sources
- ABI — “Fraudulent insurance claims continue to top £1 billion” (detected fraud totals for 2024; published 17 Nov 2025).
- Evening Standard / ABI coverage (Motor scams worth £576m; 51,700 claims; 2024).
- UK Parliament Transport Committee report (Quotes ABI 2013 motor fraud: 59,900 dishonest claims worth £811m).
- CMS Law-Now summary of ABI 2013 fraud release (£1.3bn total detected fraud; £811m motor; 59,900 claims).
- Insurance Fraud Bureau — “Crash for Cash” guidance page (Warning signs / reporting context).
- AXA UK — warning on ‘Crash for Cash’ motorcycle fraud (Recent insurer evidence of trend).
- The Guardian — reporting on doctored vehicle images used in UK insurance scams (Trend context).