Motor insurance fraud and vans: what the numbers say now, and how fleet tech helps

Van Compare is a UK van insurance price comparison website. We share general information, not personal recommendations.

Published: 26 Jun 2014 | Last reviewed: 26 Jun 2014 | Reviewed by: VanCompare Editorial Team

This article was originally written around a set of ABI figures that were widely quoted at the time. Those numbers were real — but they were for 2013, not “recent”.

In 2013, the ABI said insurers detected £1.3 billion of fraudulent insurance claims in total, and its motor fraud figures included 59,900 dishonest motor claims worth £811 million. 

What the latest ABI fraud data shows

Fast forward to the newest ABI annual detected fraud release (published 17 November 2025, covering calendar year 2024):

• Insurers Detected £1.16 billion of fraudulent general insurance claims in 2024. 
• ABI-Reported motor insurance fraud accounted for 51,700 motor scams worth £576 million in 2024 (over half of detected bogus claims by volume). 

So, while the “£811m motor fraud” figure belongs to 2013, fraud remains a major operational cost today — and motor is still a prime target.

What “fraud” looks like for van drivers and fleets in 2026

Fleet operators tend to get hit in a few predictable ways:

• Induced/staged collisions (“crash for cash”) and exaggerated injury/repair claims. The Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) flags warning signs and encourages reporting. 
• Identity/document harvesting after minor impacts (for example, criminals pushing to photograph documents) that can lead to policies and claims being taken out in someone else’s name. Recent IFB-linked warnings highlight this pattern. 
• Digitally Manipulated evidence (edited photos/“shallowfakes”) used to support claims that don’t match reality. 

How in-vehicle tech helps (and what it won’t do)

In-vehicle tech doesn’t “stop fraud”, but it can reduce how often fleets get stuck with blame — and can make it easier for insurers to challenge questionable claims.

1) Cameras (dashcams / multi-camera systems)

Useful for:
• Showing who moved first at junctions/roundabouts
• Documenting lane position and braking
• Rebutting “your driver reversed into me” style disputes
Limitations:
• Cameras Don’t always capture side impacts or what happened off-frame
• Footage Needs reliable retention, time/date accuracy, and secure handling

2) Telematics and driver data

Useful for:
• Speed/Braking/location verification
• Identifying patterns and coaching drivers (lower collision exposure overall)
Limitations:
• Doesn’t prove what another road user did, only what your van did

3) Fleet processes still matter most

• Clear “after an incident” steps (photos, witness details, immediate reporting)
• Driver Coaching on common scam patterns and safe information sharing
• Consistent defect reporting and maintenance (to avoid mixed-fault claims)

A quick “after an incident” checklist for drivers

If there’s a bump or suspicious behaviour:

• Move to a safe location if possible and call police if anyone is injured or threatened.
• Exchange only the essentials (name, address, vehicle registration) and avoid sharing extra ID unless required by police.
• Take Photos of positions, damage, road layout, and any witnesses.
• Report to your insurer/fleet manager quickly and preserve any camera footage.

Sources

1. ABI — “Fraudulent insurance claims continue to top £1 billion” (detected fraud totals for 2024; published 17 Nov 2025). 
2. Evening Standard / ABI coverage (Motor scams worth £576m; 51,700 claims; 2024). 
3. UK Parliament Transport Committee report (Quotes ABI 2013 motor fraud: 59,900 dishonest claims worth £811m). 
4. CMS Law-Now summary of ABI 2013 fraud release (£1.3bn total detected fraud; £811m motor; 59,900 claims). 
5. Insurance Fraud Bureau — “Crash for Cash” guidance page (Warning signs / reporting context). 
6. AXA UK — warning on ‘Crash for Cash’ motorcycle fraud (Recent insurer evidence of trend). 
7. The Guardian — reporting on doctored vehicle images used in UK insurance scams (Trend context). 

VanCompare Editorial Team

The VanCompare Editorial Team produces clear, practical guidance on UK van insurance and related topics. We work with FCA authorised insurance providers and use insurer information where relevant to explain cover in plain English and help drivers make informed decisions.

• Where relevant, our content is checked against publicly available UK guidance and information from sources such as the FCA and GOV.UK to help keep it accurate and up to date.
• This content is for general information only and is not financial advice.
• Learn more about our editorial standards and transparency on the VanCompare TrustHub.