Van Compare is a UK van insurance price comparison website. We share general information, not personal recommendations.
Last updated: 26 June 2014

This article was originally written around a set of ABI figures that were widely quoted at the time. Those numbers were real — but they were for 2013, not “recent”.

In 2013, the ABI said insurers detected £1.3 billion of fraudulent insurance claims in total, and its motor fraud figures included 59,900 dishonest motor claims worth £811 million. 

What the latest ABI fraud data shows

Fast forward to the newest ABI annual detected fraud release (published 17 November 2025, covering calendar year 2024):

• Insurers Detected £1.16 billion of fraudulent general insurance claims in 2024. 
• ABI-Reported motor insurance fraud accounted for 51,700 motor scams worth £576 million in 2024 (over half of detected bogus claims by volume). 

So, while the “£811m motor fraud” figure belongs to 2013, fraud remains a major operational cost today — and motor is still a prime target.

What “fraud” looks like for van drivers and fleets in 2026

Fleet operators tend to get hit in a few predictable ways:

• Induced/staged collisions (“crash for cash”) and exaggerated injury/repair claims. The Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) flags warning signs and encourages reporting. 
• Identity/document harvesting after minor impacts (for example, criminals pushing to photograph documents) that can lead to policies and claims being taken out in someone else’s name. Recent IFB-linked warnings highlight this pattern. 
• Digitally Manipulated evidence (edited photos/“shallowfakes”) used to support claims that don’t match reality. 

How in-vehicle tech helps (and what it won’t do)

In-vehicle tech doesn’t “stop fraud”, but it can reduce how often fleets get stuck with blame — and can make it easier for insurers to challenge questionable claims.

1) Cameras (dashcams / multi-camera systems)

Useful for:
• Showing who moved first at junctions/roundabouts
• Documenting lane position and braking
• Rebutting “your driver reversed into me” style disputes
Limitations:
• Cameras Don’t always capture side impacts or what happened off-frame
• Footage Needs reliable retention, time/date accuracy, and secure handling

2) Telematics and driver data

Useful for:
• Speed/Braking/location verification
• Identifying patterns and coaching drivers (lower collision exposure overall)
Limitations:
• Doesn’t prove what another road user did, only what your van did

3) Fleet processes still matter most

• Clear “after an incident” steps (photos, witness details, immediate reporting)
• Driver Coaching on common scam patterns and safe information sharing
• Consistent defect reporting and maintenance (to avoid mixed-fault claims)

A quick “after an incident” checklist for drivers

If there’s a bump or suspicious behaviour:

• Move to a safe location if possible and call police if anyone is injured or threatened.
• Exchange only the essentials (name, address, vehicle registration) and avoid sharing extra ID unless required by police.
• Take Photos of positions, damage, road layout, and any witnesses.
• Report to your insurer/fleet manager quickly and preserve any camera footage.

Sources

1. ABI — “Fraudulent insurance claims continue to top £1 billion” (detected fraud totals for 2024; published 17 Nov 2025). 
2. Evening Standard / ABI coverage (Motor scams worth £576m; 51,700 claims; 2024). 
3. UK Parliament Transport Committee report (Quotes ABI 2013 motor fraud: 59,900 dishonest claims worth £811m). 
4. CMS Law-Now summary of ABI 2013 fraud release (£1.3bn total detected fraud; £811m motor; 59,900 claims). 
5. Insurance Fraud Bureau — “Crash for Cash” guidance page (Warning signs / reporting context). 
6. AXA UK — warning on ‘Crash for Cash’ motorcycle fraud (Recent insurer evidence of trend). 
7. The Guardian — reporting on doctored vehicle images used in UK insurance scams (Trend context).