Van Compare is a UK van insurance price comparison website. We share general information, not personal recommendations.
Last updated: 18 March 2026
“Crash for cash” fraud is an ongoing issue where criminals deliberately stage or cause collisions to make money from insurance claims. UK fleet operators often look at in-vehicle cameras (dashcams or CCTV-style systems) because video evidence can help clarify what happened when there’s a dispute.
Policing guidance commonly groups “cash for crash” into three types: staged accidents, ghost accidents and induced accidents (where an innocent driver is targeted). Examples of induced crashes can include sudden heavy braking after pulling in front, or reversing into a stationary vehicle and blaming the other driver. [1]
The Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) has published a figure of £392 million as the estimated annual cost of “crash for cash” fraud. [2]
Official crime statistics don’t usually record “crash for cash” as a distinct category. A House of Commons Library briefing notes that “insurance related fraud” offences recorded by Action Fraud or referred to the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau were around 13,700 in England and Wales during 2023. [3]
Video footage can help provide an objective record of events in the event of a dispute. For example, cameras may:
Not every system works the same way. Some cameras record continuously, while others are event-triggered (for example, by harsh braking). Features such as parking-mode recording also depend on the specific equipment and how it is configured.
Policing guidance suggests several practical steps if you believe you may be involved in a “cash for crash” incident:
If you install dashcams or CCTV systems in work vehicles, you will usually be processing personal data, such as images of drivers, passengers, pedestrians or number plates. The UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) provides guidance for small businesses using dashcams and CCTV, including the need to consider registration requirements and to manage footage responsibly. [4]
For more complex monitoring setups, such as inward-facing cameras or broader driver monitoring systems, the ICO also highlights the importance of assessing privacy impacts and being transparent with drivers and passengers about how the technology is used. [5]
Some insurers may take a positive view of strong fleet risk management, but there is no automatic premium reduction for installing cameras. Insurance pricing depends on a wide range of factors, including the vehicle itself, driver details, claims history, mileage, and the insurer’s underwriting approach.
If cameras are being installed mainly for fraud defence, it can help to focus on the practical details: incident capture settings, retention periods, access controls, driver training, and clear policies on when footage may be reviewed or shared.
VanCompare Editorial Team
The VanCompare Editorial Team produces clear, practical guidance on UK van insurance and related topics. We work with FCA authorised insurance providers and use insurer information where relevant to explain cover in plain English and help drivers make informed decisions.
Where relevant, our content is checked against publicly available UK guidance and information from sources such as the FCA and GOV.UK to help keep it accurate and up to date.
This content is for general information only and is not financial advice.
How can we assist you today?
We're sad to hear that you're thinking of leaving 😔 But don't worry, we're here to help! 😇
Cancel your
renewal
Cancel before policy renews
0330 041 9310Cancel during
cooling off (14 days)
Let’s get you through to one of our friendly chat agents 😇
Chat with us